A Risk Sciences International Case Study

Systematic Review of Artificial Sweeteners and Health Risks

Artificial sweeteners

Client: International Prevention Research Institute (IPRI)

Listing of the client in no way affirms the client's support, sponsorship, or validation in any form of Risk Sciences International or the RSI staff member(s) who conducted this project during their stay with RSI or prior to joining the company. This case study is displayed for informative purposes only to demonstrate the capacity of RSI staff members. This case study reveals no proprietary information or information deemed sensitive.

Project description:

Systematic Review of Artificial Sweeteners and Health Risks

A comprehensive systematic review was undertaken to assess experimental evidence regarding the potential health risks associated with artificial sweeteners, specifically focusing on cancer and pre-term delivery. The client sought a rigorous analysis of both in vivo and in vitro experimental studies to better understand any biological associations or mechanisms that might underpin observed health outcomes.

To meet these objectives, a structured literature search was conducted across multiple scientific databases to identify relevant experimental and observational studies. Studies were screened and assessed for quality and relevance, with a particular focus on artificial sweeteners such as saccharin, cyclamates, aspartame, stevia, and others. Data extraction and synthesis were performed to evaluate carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and reproductive toxicity, including gestation length.

The resulting analysis explored whether artificial sweeteners could be linked to increased cancer risk or early delivery across mammalian models and cellular systems. The review also examined mechanisms of action, such as DNA damage, cell proliferation, and other biochemical endpoints. Findings were contextualized within existing scientific committee evaluations to assess the implications for human health risk assessments.
This work, conducted on behalf of the International Prevention Research Institute, was commissioned to support the scientific evidence needs of The Coca-Cola Company in relation to the safety profile of low- and no-calorie sweeteners.

Start: 2014

End: 2014

Experts related to this case study

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski

Nataliya Karyakina

Senior Toxicologist, Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Nataliya Karyakina is a Senior Toxicologist and Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where she has served since 2008. She plays a central role in RSI’s work at the intersection of chemical safety, regulatory science, and human...
Read More about Nataliya Karyakina

Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova

Senior Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova is a Senior Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where she has contributed since 2011 to some of the organization’s most analytically demanding and policy-relevant projects. With a background in medicine and a PhD...
Read More about Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova

More RSI Case Studies

RSI presents a very small selection of case studies to highlight some of its key work.

Building an international alliance and campaign

UN-Habitat sought to establish a new global platform to bring coherence to international dialogue on sustainable urbanization. At the outset, this initiative had no name, no identity, and no governing structure, only the recognition that cities faced pressing challenges requiring...
Read More about Building an international alliance and campaign

External Peer Review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report on Selected C3-C5 Alcohols

To support the quality and defensibility of regulatory decision-making under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA), Health Canada engaged Risk Sciences International to coordinate an independent external peer review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report (DSAR) for Selected C3-C5...
Read More about External Peer Review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report on Selected C3-C5 Alcohols

Age-Related Cognitive Decline: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis to support evidence-informed decision-making around age-related cognitive decline among practicing physicians. The initiative was led by CPSA’s Physician Health Monitoring Program (PHMP), which sought to...
Read More about Age-Related Cognitive Decline: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Environmental Health Factors, Chronic Diseases, and Pandemic Resilience

To support more effective health policy and pandemic preparedness, this project examined how environmental health factors intersect with chronic disease and influence pandemic resilience. The client sought evidence to clarify how exposures to contaminants in air, water, and soil contribute...
Read More about Environmental Health Factors, Chronic Diseases, and Pandemic Resilience

Drinking Water Guidelines for Manganese

Establishing science-based drinking water guidelines for manganese requires integrating diverse regulatory approaches, emerging modeling tools, and evolving toxicological evidence. The client commissioned this project to systematically assess existing manganese drinking water guidelines and the scientific foundations upon which they are...
Read More about Drinking Water Guidelines for Manganese

Methodology for Developing Risk Significance Insights

The project centered on supporting the development of a methodology that could eventually be implemented as an Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Learning (ML) process. The objective was to help formalize and potentially automate how professional judgment is applied when...
Read More about Methodology for Developing Risk Significance Insights

Food Inspection Scientific Analysis & Risk Modelling

In support of ongoing efforts to modernize Canada's food inspection system, a request was issued for scientific and analytical expertise to enhance two critical risk-based decision tools: the Establishment-based Risk Assessment (ERA) and Importer Risk Assessment (IRA) models. These models...
Read More about Food Inspection Scientific Analysis & Risk Modelling