RSI develops resilience metrics for clients across sectors, using stakeholder-informed frameworks and multi-dimensional indicators. Its teams validate metrics against scenarios and real-world events to ensure credibility. RSI helps integrate resilience tracking into ongoing planning, enabling adaptive management and continuous improvement.

RSI employs qualitative synthesis when integrating stakeholder perspectives, expert panels, or case history findings into its risk frameworks. The firm uses logic models, evidence tables, and deliberative processes to structure non-quantitative inputs. This expands the evidence base for decision-making, especially where formal data alone is insufficient.

RSI integrates vulnerability analysis into its community risk assessments and foresight work. Using composite indicators, geospatial data, and stakeholder input, RSI identifies priority groups or areas and recommends targeted interventions. The firm ensures that vulnerability findings inform both risk prioritization and strategy development.

RSI conducts emergency gap analyses that link risk scenarios with operational realities. Its approach combines tabletop exercises, stakeholder consultation, and systems modeling to assess functional readiness. RSI frames gaps in terms of actionable priorities and supports clients in developing roadmaps for remediation. This method integrates seamlessly with RSI’s broader risk understanding and emergency planning capabilities.

RSI uses message tailoring to deliver risk communications that are both inclusive and persuasive. It combines audience profiling, behavioral insight, and content modularity to adapt messages across contexts. RSI’s tailored messaging approach is grounded in research and refined through iterative testing.

RSI works with clients to design and implement forecasting and EWS tailored to local contexts and risk types. The firm supports model selection, threshold calibration, and end-user engagement. RSI emphasizes usability, ensuring systems trigger actions that are feasible and well-understood by responsible actors.

RSI supports organizations in crafting trust repair messages that balance transparency, humility, and a commitment to reform. Drawing on risk communication science and crisis psychology, RSI helps clients respond constructively to reputational damage and public concern. Its approach emphasizes authenticity, stakeholder dialogue, and long-term rebuilding rather than short-term image repair.

RSI develops simulation models that capture the complexity of risk-related systems, drawing on subject matter expertise, empirical data, and stakeholder input. Its models are designed to inform strategic planning, regulatory decisions, and operational readiness. RSI emphasizes transparent assumptions and usability for both technical and non-technical audiences.

RSI conducts framing and sentiment analyses to assess how risk issues are being interpreted in the media and social media. It uses these insights to adjust messaging, engage with journalists, and prepare spokespersons. RSI’s analysis helps anticipate misperceptions and shape narratives toward informed public dialogue.

RSI uses MCDA to support structured decision-making in policy, technology assessment, and risk mitigation planning. The firm works with clients to define criteria, engage stakeholders, and test sensitivity to different priorities. RSI ensures that outputs are easy to interpret and defensible, especially when justifying complex or controversial decisions.