A Risk Sciences International Case Study

Risk Prioritization Framework and Digital Engagement Platform

Online and engagement

Client: Standards Council of Canada

Listing of the client in no way affirms the client's support, sponsorship, or validation in any form of Risk Sciences International or the RSI staff member(s) who conducted this project during their stay with RSI or prior to joining the company. This case study is displayed for informative purposes only to demonstrate the capacity of RSI staff members. This case study reveals no proprietary information or information deemed sensitive.

Project description:

Risk Prioritization Framework and Digital Engagement Platform

To support its Standards to Support Resilient Infrastructure Program, the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) launched a national consultation campaign to identify and prioritize climate-related standardization needs. SCC required a flexible risk prioritization framework to evaluate the relative urgency and impact of various standardization topics related to climate change adaptation and mitigation, especially in the infrastructure sector.

The project involved developing a methodology for ranking standardization needs across thematic areas such as health and safety, economic impact, environmental risk, and geographic relevance. The goal was to equip SCC with a structured tool to inform decision-making over a 5- to 20-year planning horizon.

In parallel, a bilingual, accessible digital engagement platform was created to support the collection and analysis of stakeholder input. The platform was designed to accommodate complex surveys and a high volume of participation, enabling SCC to gather meaningful feedback from professionals involved in infrastructure design, maintenance, and policy.

A literature review and preliminary survey analysis were conducted to identify existing standards and gaps, with the findings organized into thematic areas of need. These results fed into a final report and inventory list summarizing the most pressing standardization priorities as identified through the national consultation process. This work played a critical role in shaping SCC’s strategic planning for future standards development.

Start: 2019

End: 2019

Experts related to this case study

Greg Paoli

CEO, Principal Risk Scientist

Greg Paoli is the CEO and Principal Risk Scientist at Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm he co-founded in 2006 following the integration of his earlier consultancy, Decisionalysis Risk Consultants, with the consulting activities of the McLaughlin Centre for Population...
Read More about Greg Paoli

Cemil ‘Jim’ Alyanak

Vice-President Communications and Strategic Initiatives

Cemil ‘Jim’ Alyanak joined Risk Sciences International (RSI) in 2018 and serves as Vice-President, Communications and Strategic Initiatives. In this senior leadership role, he leads RSI’s risk communications practice, drives cross-cutting initiatives, advances strategic in-house projects, and expands the company’s...
Read More about Cemil ‘Jim’ Alyanak

More RSI Case Studies

RSI presents a very small selection of case studies to highlight some of its key work.

EFSA Framework for Problem Formulation

To enhance the methodological rigour of its scientific assessments, EFSA sought to develop a standardised framework for problem formulation (PF) within its non-application scientific assessment protocols. The goal was to support the planning phase of these assessments by establishing a...
Read More about EFSA Framework for Problem Formulation

Institutional & communications assessment

In the mid-1990s the International Organization for Migration (IOM) faced one of the most pivotal moments in its history. Though it counted 76 member states, it remained outside the United Nations system, and its work was increasingly perceived to overlap...
Read More about Institutional & communications assessment

Pickering Nuclear Facility Re‑licensing

The client sought support to finalize a Commission Member Document (CMD) for the re‑licensing of a nuclear facility. Recognizing the complexity and sensitivity of reactor re‑licensing, they requested assistance in crafting communication materials that were both technically comprehensive and accessible...
Read More about Pickering Nuclear Facility Re‑licensing

External Peer Review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report on Selected C3-C5 Alcohols

To support the quality and defensibility of regulatory decision-making under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA), Health Canada engaged Risk Sciences International to coordinate an independent external peer review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report (DSAR) for Selected C3-C5...
Read More about External Peer Review of the Draft Screening Assessment Report on Selected C3-C5 Alcohols

Risk Communication on McIntyre Powder

In response to increasing public concern about the historical use of McIntyre Powder—an aluminum-based substance once administered to miners in Ontario to prevent silicosis—the client sought expert guidance on managing risk communication related to potential health implications. Widespread media coverage...
Read More about Risk Communication on McIntyre Powder

Risk-Based Decision-Making (RBDM) Support for Plasma Supply / Sufficiency

Facing renewed challenges in securing a reliable domestic plasma supply, Canadian Blood Services sought support to apply a Risk-Based Decision-Making (RBDM) framework. The objective was to assess the value and implications of expanding domestic plasma collection and processing capacity in...
Read More about Risk-Based Decision-Making (RBDM) Support for Plasma Supply / Sufficiency