RSI supports clients in selecting and applying decision criteria suited to their context and risk appetite. Its team facilitates structured decision-making processes, often involving stakeholder consultation and uncertainty modeling. RSI ensures that chosen criteria are clearly articulated, consistently applied, and documented in a way that supports both accountability and future learning.

RSI uses data analysis and mining to support evidence synthesis, pattern detection, and trend forecasting in risk contexts. Whether analyzing incident databases, health surveillance data, or regulatory submissions, RSI applies statistically sound methods tailored to data characteristics and decision needs. RSI’s emphasis on interpretability ensures that findings are not only technically valid but also decision-useful—bridging analytics and policy in a coherent risk understanding approach.

RSI uses attitudinal research to inform how technical risk assessments are likely to be received and acted upon. By pairing social science methods with structured stakeholder mapping, RSI helps clients integrate public values into policy planning and risk framing. This approach is especially useful in contentious or uncertain domains, where trust and perception may drive more outcomes than formal risk calculations. RSI’s ability to translate sentiment into actionable insight strengthens its Understanding Risk capacity.

RSI conducts public perception research to inform risk communication plans, stakeholder engagement strategies, and regulatory initiatives. Its multidisciplinary teams ensure that perception data is rigorously gathered and contextually analyzed. RSI helps clients understand not just what the public thinks, but why—and how that shapes the effectiveness of risk interventions.

RSI designs and facilitates scenario-based exercises that test governance, communications, and technical systems under pressure. Its method integrates structured debriefs and performance assessment. RSI uses the insights gained to refine preparedness, improve coordination, and support evidence-based adaptation of risk management plans.

RSI supports policy development across health, environmental, and infrastructure domains. The firm integrates scientific evidence, risk assessments, and stakeholder perspectives to craft clear and enforceable policies. RSI also provides implementation roadmaps and evaluation frameworks, ensuring that policies are not only sound on paper but practical in execution.

RSI conducts structured option appraisals for clients in health, environment, and public safety sectors. The firm integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, engages stakeholders, and provides comparative visualizations. RSI ensures that results are policy-relevant, actionable, and transparent to decision-makers and affected parties alike.

RSI embeds message pre-testing into its communication design process. The firm develops prototypes and guides structured audience feedback loops. RSI ensures that messages meet comprehension thresholds, cultural appropriateness, and behavioral relevance—especially in high-risk or high-stakes contexts.

RSI uses MCDA to support structured decision-making in policy, technology assessment, and risk mitigation planning. The firm works with clients to define criteria, engage stakeholders, and test sensitivity to different priorities. RSI ensures that outputs are easy to interpret and defensible, especially when justifying complex or controversial decisions.

RSI conducts reference value derivation as part of its toxicological and regulatory work. The firm applies established methodologies, transparently selects uncertainty factors, and prepares documentation suitable for regulatory review. RSI ensures that derived values reflect current science and are communicated clearly to support risk-based decision-making.