A Risk Sciences International Case Study

Risk Communication on McIntyre Powder

McIntyre Powder

Client: International Aluminium Institute

Listing of the client in no way affirms the client's support, sponsorship, or validation in any form of Risk Sciences International or the RSI staff member(s) who conducted this project during their stay with RSI or prior to joining the company. This case study is displayed for informative purposes only to demonstrate the capacity of RSI staff members. This case study reveals no proprietary information or information deemed sensitive.

Project description:

Risk Communication on McIntyre Powder

In response to increasing public concern about the historical use of McIntyre Powder—an aluminum-based substance once administered to miners in Ontario to prevent silicosis—the client sought expert guidance on managing risk communication related to potential health implications. Widespread media coverage and advocacy had raised public awareness and intensified scrutiny, particularly about possible links between aluminum exposure and long-term respiratory and neurological conditions.

The client aimed to develop a communication strategy to address fears that narratives around McIntyre Powder might extend to general concerns about aluminum exposure in everyday contexts. They required a scientifically grounded yet publicly accessible approach to contextualize the historic use of the substance while maintaining confidence in current aluminum safety standards.

To support these goals, RSI proposed and delivered a multi-phase risk communication initiative. The work began with validation of key issues highlighted in public discourse, followed by the development of a strategic communication plan tailored to defined audiences. Web-based materials were crafted to reflect the agreed-upon messaging, with client and expert reviews informing multiple revisions. A focus group session tested the clarity and resonance of the messages, ensuring alignment with audience perceptions.

In addition to finalized web materials, RSI developed internal communication tools, including talking points and Q&A documents, to help stakeholders respond consistently and effectively to inquiries. These materials underwent expert review to ensure both technical accuracy and communication effectiveness.

Start: 2018

End: 2018

Experts related to this case study

Anne Wiles

Senior Analyst

Dr. Anne Wiles joined Risk Sciences International (RSI) in 2008, where she currently serves as a Senior Analyst specializing in risk communication, perception, and governance. With a distinctive blend of expertise in language, regulation, and the use of science in...
Read More about Anne Wiles

Nataliya Karyakina

Senior Toxicologist, Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Nataliya Karyakina is a Senior Toxicologist and Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where she has served since 2008. She plays a central role in RSI’s work at the intersection of chemical safety, regulatory science, and human...
Read More about Nataliya Karyakina

More RSI Case Studies

RSI presents a very small selection of case studies to highlight some of its key work.

Assessing the Impact of Interstudy Variation in LOAELs on Findings of Low-Dose Additivity in In Vivo Studies of Mixtures

Demonstrating the safe use of chemical mixtures remains a critical challenge in toxicological science. In recent years, studies have suggested that chemicals can exhibit dose additivity—causing a combined effect—even when each chemical individually is below its effect threshold. This project...
Read More about Assessing the Impact of Interstudy Variation in LOAELs on Findings of Low-Dose Additivity in In Vivo Studies of Mixtures

Environmental Health Factors, Chronic Diseases, and Pandemic Resilience

To support more effective health policy and pandemic preparedness, this project examined how environmental health factors intersect with chronic disease and influence pandemic resilience. The client sought evidence to clarify how exposures to contaminants in air, water, and soil contribute...
Read More about Environmental Health Factors, Chronic Diseases, and Pandemic Resilience

Analysis in Support of Risk-Based Decision-Making for the Alberta Safety Codes Council

An independent regulatory organization responsible for oversight of Alberta’s safety codes system sought to strengthen its capacity for risk-based decision-making. The organization aimed to ensure that regulatory actions—particularly in the area of petroleum storage tanks—were guided by clear, evidence-based prioritization...
Read More about Analysis in Support of Risk-Based Decision-Making for the Alberta Safety Codes Council

Characterizing uncertainty in MAF values estimated using the KEMI MAF

The client sought to improve understanding of uncertainties surrounding the application of mixture assessment factors (MAFs) for aquatic receptors, specifically those estimated using the KEMI methodology. While the KEMI MAF approach is considered technically robust, its assumptions—particularly about chemical-specific controls,...
Read More about Characterizing uncertainty in MAF values estimated using the KEMI MAF

Risk Model Framework for Foodborne Campylobacteriosis via Poultry Meat Pathway

To support national public health goals, RSI was tasked with developing a quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) model to estimate the human health risks associated with the consumption of chicken in New Zealand. The core objective was to quantify the...
Read More about Risk Model Framework for Foodborne Campylobacteriosis via Poultry Meat Pathway