Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

External validation and comparison of two variants of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures for all-cause mortality.

Assessing prevalent comorbidities is a common approach in health research for identifying clinical differences between individuals. The objective of this study was to validate and compare the predictive performance of two variants of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures (ECM) for inhospital mortality at index and at 1-year in the Cerner Health Facts(R) (HF) U.S. DATABASE: We estimated the prevalence of select comorbidities for individuals 18 to 89 years of age who received care at Cerner contributing health facilities between 2002 and 2011 using the AHRQ (version 3.7) and the Quan Enhanced ICD-9-CM ECMs. External validation of the ECMs was assessed with measures of discrimination [c-statistics], calibration [Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, Brier Score, calibration curves], added predictive ability [Net Reclassification Improvement], and overall model performance [R2]. Of 3,273,298 patients with a mean age of 43.9 years and a female composition of 53.8%, 1.0% died during their index encounter and 1.5% were deceased at 1-year. Calibration measures were equivalent between the two ECMs. Calibration performance was acceptable when predicting inhospital mortality at index, although recalibration is recommended for predicting inhospital mortality at 1 year. Discrimination was marginally better with the Quan ECM compared the AHRQ ECM when predicting inhospital mortality at index (cQuan = 0.887, 95% CI: 0.885-0.889 vs. cAHRQ = 0.880, 95% CI: 0.878-0.882; p < .0001) and at 1-year (cQuan = 0.884, 95% CI: 0.883-0.886 vs. cAHRQ = 0.880, 95% CI: 0.878-0.881, p < .0001). Both the Quan and the AHRQ ECMs demonstrated excellent discrimination for inhospital mortality of all-causes in Cerner Health Facts(R), a HIPAA compliant observational research and privacy-protected data warehouse. While differences in discrimination performance between the ECMs were statistically significant, they are not likely clinically meaningful.

Authors

  • Fortin, Yannick, Fortin Y, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

  • Crispo, James A G, Crispo JA, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Fulbright Canada Student, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

  • Cohen, Deborah, Cohen D, School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Canadian Population Health Initiative (CPHI), Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • McNair, Douglas S, McNair DS, Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.

  • Mattison, Donald R, Mattison DR, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Risk Sciences International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Risk Sciences International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2017
SOURCE: PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174379. eCollection 2017.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: PLoS One
JOURNAL TITLE: PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) 1932-6203 (Linking)
VOLUME: 12
ISSUE: 3
PAGES: e0174379
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: United States
ABSTRACT:
Assessing prevalent comorbidities is a common approach in health research for identifying clinical differences between individuals. The objective of this study was to validate and compare the predictive performance of two variants of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures (ECM) for inhospital mortality at index and at 1-year in the Cerner Health Facts(R) (HF) U.S. DATABASE: We estimated the prevalence of select comorbidities for individuals 18 to 89 years of age who received care at Cerner contributing health facilities between 2002 and 2011 using the AHRQ (version 3.7) and the Quan Enhanced ICD-9-CM ECMs. External validation of the ECMs was assessed with measures of discrimination [c-statistics], calibration [Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, Brier Score, calibration curves], added predictive ability [Net Reclassification Improvement], and overall model performance [R2]. Of 3,273,298 patients with a mean age of 43.9 years and a female composition of 53.8%, 1.0% died during their index encounter and 1.5% were deceased at 1-year. Calibration measures were equivalent between the two ECMs. Calibration performance was acceptable when predicting inhospital mortality at index, although recalibration is recommended for predicting inhospital mortality at 1 year. Discrimination was marginally better with the Quan ECM compared the AHRQ ECM when predicting inhospital mortality at index (cQuan = 0.887, 95% CI: 0.885-0.889 vs. cAHRQ = 0.880, 95% CI: 0.878-0.882; p < .0001) and at 1-year (cQuan = 0.884, 95% CI: 0.883-0.886 vs. cAHRQ = 0.880, 95% CI: 0.878-0.881, p < .0001). Both the Quan and the AHRQ ECMs demonstrated excellent discrimination for inhospital mortality of all-causes in Cerner Health Facts(R), a HIPAA compliant observational research and privacy-protected data warehouse. While differences in discrimination performance between the ECMs were statistically significant, they are not likely clinically meaningful.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2017
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20170328
DATE COMPLETED: 20170905
DATE REVISED: 20220318
MESH DATE: 2017/09/07 06:00
EDAT: 2017/03/30 06:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: epublish
LOCATION IDENTIFIER: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174379 [doi] e0174379
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski

Donald Mattison

Chief Medical Officer, Senior Vice-President

Dr. Donald Mattison joined Risk Sciences International (RSI) in 2012 as Senior Vice-President and Chief Medical Officer, bringing with him a distinguished career spanning public health, clinical medicine, toxicology, and academic leadership. His appointment significantly strengthened RSI’s capacity to deliver...
Read More about Donald Mattison

Douglas McNair


As a Software Engineering Fellow at RSI, Dr. McNair brings unparalleled expertise in machine learning, Bayesian modeling, and decision-support systems. He supports RSI’s most advanced projects by designing and validating AI/ML architectures that meet both regulatory standards and ethical imperatives,...
Read More about Douglas McNair