Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Database of radiogenic cancer in experimental animals exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation.

For decades, there have been debates regarding the nature of the relationship between exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation and cancer risk. Under the linear no-threshold hypothesis, which serves as a theoretical basis for current radiation protection standards, the risk of cancer at low levels of exposure is presumed to be directly proportional to dose. Opponents of this hypothesis claim that there are threshold doses for radiation carcinogenesis, or even a reduction in cancer risk at low doses (a phenomenon referred to as “radiation hormesis”). Epidemiological, animal, molecular, and cellular studies were conducted to resolve this controversy, although each of these study types has its strengths and limitations. Although the results of animal experiments are not directly applicable to humans, data can substantially add to our knowledge on the form of relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk in a wide range of doses. Laboratory animals are a homogeneous population with little biological variability; animal experiments are conducted under controlled conditions with good estimates of radiation doses. In order to address the question of whether or not the dose-response curve for radiation carcinogens is linear at low doses, a comprehensive database of animal carcinogenesis experiments was assembled involving exposure to different types of ionizing gradation. The database includes virtually all publicly accessible data on the induction of radiogenic cancer in laboratory mammals. This review provides a descriptive overview of the experiments included in the database, along with a qualitative assessment of the shape of the dose-response relationship for radiation carcinogenesis at low doses in experimental animals.

Authors

  • Duport, Philippe, Duport P, Institute of the Environment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

  • Jiang, Huixia, Jiang H,

  • Shilnikova, Natalia S, Shilnikova NS,

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D,

  • Zielinski, Jan M, Zielinski JM,

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2012
SOURCE: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2012;15(3):186-209. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2012.659136.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev
JOURNAL TITLE: Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews
ISSN: 1521-6950 (Electronic) 1093-7404 (Linking)
VOLUME: 15
ISSUE: 3
PAGES: 186-209
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: England
ABSTRACT:
For decades, there have been debates regarding the nature of the relationship between exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation and cancer risk. Under the linear no-threshold hypothesis, which serves as a theoretical basis for current radiation protection standards, the risk of cancer at low levels of exposure is presumed to be directly proportional to dose. Opponents of this hypothesis claim that there are threshold doses for radiation carcinogenesis, or even a reduction in cancer risk at low doses (a phenomenon referred to as "radiation hormesis"). Epidemiological, animal, molecular, and cellular studies were conducted to resolve this controversy, although each of these study types has its strengths and limitations. Although the results of animal experiments are not directly applicable to humans, data can substantially add to our knowledge on the form of relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk in a wide range of doses. Laboratory animals are a homogeneous population with little biological variability; animal experiments are conducted under controlled conditions with good estimates of radiation doses. In order to address the question of whether or not the dose-response curve for radiation carcinogens is linear at low doses, a comprehensive database of animal carcinogenesis experiments was assembled involving exposure to different types of ionizing gradation. The database includes virtually all publicly accessible data on the induction of radiogenic cancer in laboratory mammals. This review provides a descriptive overview of the experiments included in the database, along with a qualitative assessment of the shape of the dose-response relationship for radiation carcinogenesis at low doses in experimental animals.
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION: Copyright (c) Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2012
DATE COMPLETED: 20120515
DATE REVISED: 20120330
MESH DATE: 2012/05/16 06:00
EDAT: 2012/03/31 06:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
LOCATION IDENTIFIER: 10.1080/10937404.2012.659136 [doi]
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski

Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova

Senior Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova is a Senior Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where she has contributed since 2011 to some of the organization’s most analytically demanding and policy-relevant projects. With a background in medicine and a PhD...
Read More about Natalia (Natasha) Shilnikova