A Risk Sciences International Case Study

EFSA Framework for Problem Formulation

European Food Safety Authority logo

Client: European Food Safety Authority

Listing of the client in no way affirms the client's support, sponsorship, or validation in any form of Risk Sciences International or the RSI staff member(s) who conducted this project during their stay with RSI or prior to joining the company. This case study is displayed for informative purposes only to demonstrate the capacity of RSI staff members. This case study reveals no proprietary information or information deemed sensitive.

Project description:

EFSA Framework for Problem Formulation

To enhance the methodological rigour of its scientific assessments, EFSA sought to develop a standardised framework for problem formulation (PF) within its non-application scientific assessment protocols. The goal was to support the planning phase of these assessments by establishing a structured, reproducible approach for translating mandates into scientifically answerable questions. This included creating a framework that could guide the breakdown of complex assessment questions into sub-questions, develop conceptual models, and prioritise elements of the assessment based on their relevance and potential impact.

The project called for a revised classification of question types used across EFSA's scientific opinions, building on an earlier 2020 draft internal framework. This classification was to be informed by a review of EFSA opinions from the prior two years, covering both regulated and non-regulated product domains. In parallel, an overview of existing PF approaches was needed, including strategies for decomposing assessment questions and handling uncertainty.

A comprehensive PF framework tailored to the EFSA context was to be developed, incorporating structured guidance on the translation of mandates, question classification, sub-question formulation, and conceptual modelling. Additionally, the work included the creation of a practical decision tree to support the consistent application of the PF process. To demonstrate applicability, the framework was to be illustrated with showcase examples from selected assessment domains. The end result was to be a scientific report detailing the full framework and its methodological underpinnings.

Start: 2019

End: 2019

Experts related to this case study

Franco Momoli

Vice-President Chemical and Product Safety

Dr. Franco Momoli joined Risk Sciences International (RSI) in 2019 and currently serves as Vice-President, Chemical and Product Safety. In this role, he leads a multidisciplinary team of epidemiologists, risk assessors, toxicologists, and biostatisticians in conducting human health risk assessments...
Read More about Franco Momoli

Greg Paoli

CEO, Principal Risk Scientist

Greg Paoli is the CEO and Principal Risk Scientist at Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm he co-founded in 2006 following the integration of his earlier consultancy, Decisionalysis Risk Consultants, with the consulting activities of the McLaughlin Centre for Population...
Read More about Greg Paoli

Michael G. Tyshenko

Senior Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Michael G. Tyshenko is a Senior Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where he has contributed since 2018 to the organization’s most complex and cross-cutting public health risk issues. As RSI’s lead on chemical peer reviews, he...
Read More about Michael G. Tyshenko

More RSI Case Studies

RSI presents a very small selection of case studies to highlight some of its key work.

Risk-based decision making framework

The Alliance of Blood Operators (ABO) sought to move its members toward a consistent, transparent approach to risk-based decision-making. Having worked through the development of a framework, the organization now wanted formal adoption, external validation, and practical application to real-world...
Read More about Risk-based decision making framework

Analysis in Support of Risk-Based Decision-Making for the Alberta Safety Codes Council

An independent regulatory organization responsible for oversight of Alberta’s safety codes system sought to strengthen its capacity for risk-based decision-making. The organization aimed to ensure that regulatory actions—particularly in the area of petroleum storage tanks—were guided by clear, evidence-based prioritization...
Read More about Analysis in Support of Risk-Based Decision-Making for the Alberta Safety Codes Council

Environmental Public Health Approach (EPHA) to Chemicals Expert Workshop

To advance the Government of Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan (CMP), a virtual expert workshop was planned and hosted to refine and evaluate a Canadian framework for the Environmental Public Health Approach (EPHA) to chemicals. The initiative focused on developing case...
Read More about Environmental Public Health Approach (EPHA) to Chemicals Expert Workshop

Development of a National Food Safety Information System and Risk Assessment Capacity in Vietnam

Authorities in Vietnam sought targeted expertise to strengthen the country’s ability to detect, assess, and respond to food safety threats. This initiative had two linked objectives: building a comprehensive, transparent, and reliable national food safety information system, and enhancing risk...
Read More about Development of a National Food Safety Information System and Risk Assessment Capacity in Vietnam

Methodology for Developing Risk Significance Insights

The project centered on supporting the development of a methodology that could eventually be implemented as an Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Learning (ML) process. The objective was to help formalize and potentially automate how professional judgment is applied when...
Read More about Methodology for Developing Risk Significance Insights