Archive page of posts in this category or categories:
Methods, Understanding methods
The following posts are in no particular order. They are purposely randomized.
Predictive modeling
RSI uses predictive modeling in public health forecasting, emergency preparedness, and scenario planning. It combines machine learning, regression models, and simulation approaches tailored to each risk domain. RSI emphasizes not only accuracy but explainability, ensuring that decision-makers can trust and act on the forecasts provided.
Read More Acceptability thresholds for decision-making
RSI supports clients in defining and justifying acceptability thresholds that are scientifically sound and policy-relevant. The firm draws from regulatory precedents, stakeholder input, and empirical data to tailor thresholds to context-specific needs. RSI ensures that these thresholds are transparently documented and aligned with broader risk governance frameworks, improving the defensibility and clarity of management decisions.
Read More Workshop facilitation for evidence interpretation
RSI designs and leads interpretive workshops for clients in government, industry, and civil society. Its facilitators prepare accessible materials, define goals, and create structured discussion formats. RSI ensures that diverse viewpoints are integrated and that outputs are captured for use in reports, models, or policy briefs.
Read More Public engagement in message design
RSI integrates public engagement into communication planning for risks with broad societal impact. The firm facilitates collaborative design sessions and uses participatory tools to elicit preferences and expectations. RSI ensures that outputs reflect both technical accuracy and public resonance, supporting socially responsive communication.
Read More Multi-criteria decision analysis
RSI uses MCDA to support structured decision-making in policy, technology assessment, and risk mitigation planning. The firm works with clients to define criteria, engage stakeholders, and test sensitivity to different priorities. RSI ensures that outputs are easy to interpret and defensible, especially when justifying complex or controversial decisions.
Read More Communication campaigns
RSI develops risk communication campaigns that blend strategy, evidence, and creativity. It coordinates across platforms, audiences, and timeframes to maximize reach and impact. RSI ensures campaigns are informed by both behavioral science and regulatory context, delivering messages that resonate, inform, and activate their intended recipients.
Read More Communication protocols in emergencies
RSI helps design, test, and evaluate emergency communication protocols that integrate with broader incident management systems. The firm considers audience needs, operational constraints, and regulatory frameworks, ensuring protocols are clear, tested, and scalable. RSI’s expertise in both communication and crisis planning allows for effective integration across platforms.
Read More Emergency response integration
RSI contributes to integrated emergency response planning by aligning jurisdictional roles, integrating SOPs, and mapping communication flows. RSI conducts readiness assessments and gap analyses to identify weaknesses in interagency collaboration. The firm ensures that integration mechanisms are tested and adaptable to different emergency scenarios.
Read More Monitoring and evaluation
RSI designs and conducts M&E frameworks tailored to regulatory programs, emergency plans, or public engagement efforts. It defines meaningful indicators, collects robust data, and synthesizes findings for stakeholders. RSI emphasizes learning-oriented evaluation, helping clients improve programs while demonstrating value and performance.
Read More Collaborative governance
RSI facilitates collaborative governance structures in areas like environmental stewardship, emergency preparedness, and infrastructure planning. Its approach emphasizes structured dialogue, power-sharing, and outcome-focused agendas. RSI is particularly skilled at helping diverse actors work toward aligned risk management goals despite differing mandates or capacities.
Read More