Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Principles of risk decision-making.

Risk management decisions in public health require consideration of a number of complex, often conflicting factors. The aim of this review was to propose a set of 10 fundamental principles to guide risk decision-making. Although each of these principles is sound in its own right, the guidance provided by different principles might lead the decision-maker in different directions. For example, where the precautionary principle advocates for preemptive risk management action under situations of scientific uncertainty and potentially catastrophic consequences, the principle of risk-based decision-making encourages decision-makers to focus on established and modifiable risks, where a return on the investment in risk management is all but guaranteed in the near term. To evaluate the applicability of the 10 principles in practice, one needs to consider 10 diverse risk issues of broad concern and explore which of these principles are most appropriate in different contexts. The 10 principles presented here afford substantive insight into the process of risk management decision-making, although decision-makers will ultimately need to exercise judgment in reaching appropriate risk decisions, accounting for all of the scientific and extra-scientific factors relevant to the risk decision at hand.

Authors

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Saunders-Hastings, Patrick, Saunders-Hastings P, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Larkin, Patricia, Larkin P, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Westphal, Margit, Westphal M, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Tyshenko, Michael G, Tyshenko MG, Risk Sciences International, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Leiss, William, Leiss W, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Dusseault, Maurice, Dusseault M, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

  • Jerrett, Michael, Jerrett M, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

  • Coyle, Doug, Coyle D, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2022
SOURCE: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2022 Jul 4;25(5):250-278. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2022.2107591. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev
JOURNAL TITLE: Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews
ISSN: 1521-6950 (Electronic) 1093-7404 (Linking)
VOLUME: 25
ISSUE: 5
PAGES: 250-278
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: England
ABSTRACT:
Risk management decisions in public health require consideration of a number of complex, often conflicting factors. The aim of this review was to propose a set of 10 fundamental principles to guide risk decision-making. Although each of these principles is sound in its own right, the guidance provided by different principles might lead the decision-maker in different directions. For example, where the precautionary principle advocates for preemptive risk management action under situations of scientific uncertainty and potentially catastrophic consequences, the principle of risk-based decision-making encourages decision-makers to focus on established and modifiable risks, where a return on the investment in risk management is all but guaranteed in the near term. To evaluate the applicability of the 10 principles in practice, one needs to consider 10 diverse risk issues of broad concern and explore which of these principles are most appropriate in different contexts. The 10 principles presented here afford substantive insight into the process of risk management decision-making, although decision-makers will ultimately need to exercise judgment in reaching appropriate risk decisions, accounting for all of the scientific and extra-scientific factors relevant to the risk decision at hand.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2022 Jul 4
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20220818
DATE COMPLETED: 20220829
DATE REVISED: 20221013
MESH DATE: 2022/08/30 06:00
EDAT: 2022/08/19 06:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
LOCATION IDENTIFIER: 10.1080/10937404.2022.2107591 [doi]
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski

Michael G. Tyshenko

Senior Health Risk Analyst

Dr. Michael G. Tyshenko is a Senior Health Risk Analyst at Risk Sciences International (RSI), where he has contributed since 2018 to some of the organization’s most complex and cross-cutting public health risk projects. As RSI’s lead on chemical peer...
Read More about Michael G. Tyshenko

William Leiss


As a Senior Advisor and Associate Expert with Risk Sciences International, Dr. Leiss contributes unparalleled insight into the design, delivery, and evaluation of risk communication strategies for government, regulatory bodies, and civil society. His legacy work in building public trust...
Read More about William Leiss

Patricia Larkin


Dr. Larkin serves as an Associate Expert at Risk Sciences International, specializing in policy, regulatory analysis, and population health risk assessment. Her work with RSI has included life cycle assessments of metals, as well as a review of Alberta’s Water...
Read More about Patricia Larkin