Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to the mode of delivery and birth weight. STUDY DESIGN: Data from a retrospective cohort study that was based on all twin births in the United States (1995-1997) were used. RESULTS: A total of 15,185 vertex-nonvertex second twins were classified into 3 groups: (1) both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery (37.7%), (2) both twins were delivered vaginally (46.8%), and (3) the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after vaginal delivery of the first twin (15.5%). The risk of asphyxia-related neonatal deaths and morbidity was increased in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery. The increase in neonatal death in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally was stronger in the birth weight of < 1500 g. In contrast, in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally, the increase in neonatal morbidity was greater in the group in which the birth weight was 1500 to 4000 g. CONCLUSION: The risk of neonatal death and morbidity in second-born twins is higher in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally compared with the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery.

Authors

  • Yang, Qiuying, Yang Q, OMNI Research Group, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Unveristy of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. qyang@ohri.ca

  • Wen, Shi Wu, Wen SW,

  • Chen, Yue, Chen Y,

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D,

  • Fung Kee Fung, Karen, Fung Kee Fung K,

  • Walker, Mark, Walker M,

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2005
SOURCE: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):840-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.132.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: Am J Obstet Gynecol
JOURNAL TITLE: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 0002-9378 (Print) 0002-9378 (Linking)
VOLUME: 192
ISSUE: 3
PAGES: 840-7
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: United States
ABSTRACT:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to the mode of delivery and birth weight. STUDY DESIGN: Data from a retrospective cohort study that was based on all twin births in the United States (1995-1997) were used. RESULTS: A total of 15,185 vertex-nonvertex second twins were classified into 3 groups: (1) both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery (37.7%), (2) both twins were delivered vaginally (46.8%), and (3) the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after vaginal delivery of the first twin (15.5%). The risk of asphyxia-related neonatal deaths and morbidity was increased in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery. The increase in neonatal death in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally was stronger in the birth weight of < 1500 g. In contrast, in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally, the increase in neonatal morbidity was greater in the group in which the birth weight was 1500 to 4000 g. CONCLUSION: The risk of neonatal death and morbidity in second-born twins is higher in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally compared with the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2005 Mar
DATE COMPLETED: 20050401
DATE REVISED: 20061030
MESH DATE: 2005/04/02 09:00
EDAT: 2005/03/05 09:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski