Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer in Montreal: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to examine the association between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer among never smokers, defined as subjects who smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study on lung cancer in Montreal, Canada (1996-2000) including 1,203 cases and 1513 controls. The present analysis is restricted to the 44 cases and 436 population controls who reported never smoking and completed the questionnaire on lifetime ETS exposure. Collected information included duration and intensity of exposure from multiple sources: inside home (parents, spouses, roommates and any other co-resident) and outside homes (in vehicles, social settings, and workplace). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated between ETS and lung cancer, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), and proxy respondent. RESULTS: Overall there was no association between ETS cumulative exposure from all sources (measured in pack-years) and lung cancer: OR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.40-2.38), comparing upper with lower tertiles of exposure. While there were no elevated ORs associated with ever having lived with parents who smoked (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.32-1.21) or with spouses who smoked (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18-0.85), ETS exposure from sources outside homes was associated with a slight, although non-significant increased risk: OR = 2.30 (95%CI: 0.85-6.19) for the upper 50% exposed. There were no clear differences in ORs by age at exposure to ETS or by histologic type of tumour, though numbers of subjects in subgroup analyses were too small to provide reliable estimates. CONCLUSION: No clear association between lifetime ETS exposure from all sources and increased risk of lung cancer was found in the current study.

Authors

  • Al-Zoughool, Mustafa, Al-Zoughool M, McLaughlin Center of Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. malzough@uottawa.ca.

  • Pintos, Javier, Pintos J,

  • Richardson, Lesley, Richardson L,

  • Parent, Marie-Elise, Parent ME,

  • Ghadirian, Parviz, Ghadirian P,

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D,

  • Siemiatycki, Jack, Siemiatycki J,

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2013
SOURCE: Environ Health. 2013 Dec 18;12:112. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-112.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: Environ Health
JOURNAL TITLE: Environmental health : a global access science source
ISSN: 1476-069X (Electronic) 1476-069X (Linking)
VOLUME: 12
PAGES: 112
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: England
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to examine the association between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer among never smokers, defined as subjects who smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study on lung cancer in Montreal, Canada (1996-2000) including 1,203 cases and 1513 controls. The present analysis is restricted to the 44 cases and 436 population controls who reported never smoking and completed the questionnaire on lifetime ETS exposure. Collected information included duration and intensity of exposure from multiple sources: inside home (parents, spouses, roommates and any other co-resident) and outside homes (in vehicles, social settings, and workplace). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated between ETS and lung cancer, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), and proxy respondent. RESULTS: Overall there was no association between ETS cumulative exposure from all sources (measured in pack-years) and lung cancer: OR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.40-2.38), comparing upper with lower tertiles of exposure. While there were no elevated ORs associated with ever having lived with parents who smoked (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.32-1.21) or with spouses who smoked (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18-0.85), ETS exposure from sources outside homes was associated with a slight, although non-significant increased risk: OR = 2.30 (95%CI: 0.85-6.19) for the upper 50% exposed. There were no clear differences in ORs by age at exposure to ETS or by histologic type of tumour, though numbers of subjects in subgroup analyses were too small to provide reliable estimates. CONCLUSION: No clear association between lifetime ETS exposure from all sources and increased risk of lung cancer was found in the current study.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2013 Dec 18
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20131218
DATE COMPLETED: 20150406
DATE REVISED: 20250608
MESH DATE: 2015/04/07 06:00
EDAT: 2013/12/19 06:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: epublish
LOCATION IDENTIFIER: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-112 [doi]
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski

Mustafa Al-Zoughool

Senior Toxicologist

Dr. Al-Zoughool has maintained a long-standing relationship with Risk Sciences International, both as a scientific collaborator and as a co-investigator on complex international projects. His work with RSI focuses on high-level public health risk modeling, mechanistic data analysis, and toxicological...
Read More about Mustafa Al-Zoughool