Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Ethical principles for regulatory risk decision-making.

Risk assessors, managers, and decision-makers are responsible for evaluating diverse human, environmental, and animal health risks. Although the critical elements of risk assessment and management are well-described in national and international documents, the ethical issues involved in risk decision-making have received comparatively little attention to date. To address this aspect, this article elaborates fundamental ethical principles designed to support fair, balanced, and equitable risk-based decision-making practices. Experts and global thinkers in risk, health, regulatory, and animal sciences were convened to share their lived experiences in relation to the intersection between risk science and analysis, regulatory science, and public health. Through a participatory and knowledge translation approach, an integrated risk decision-making model, with ethical principles and considerations, was developed and applied using diverse, contemporary risk decision-making and regulatory contexts. The ten principles – autonomy, minimize harm, maintain respect and trust, adaptability, reduce disparities, holistic, fair and just, open and transparent, stakeholder engagement, and One Health lens – demonstrate how public sector values and moral norms (i.e., ethics) are relevant to risk decision-making. We also hope these principles and considerations stimulate further discussion, debate, and an increased awareness of the application of ethics in identifying, assessing, and managing health risks.

Authors

  • Bhuller, Yadvinder, Bhuller Y, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: ybhul063@uottawa.ca.

  • Avey, Marc, Avey M, Standards at Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Deonandan, Raywat, Deonandan R, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Hartung, Thomas, Hartung T, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; CAAT-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

  • Hilton, Gina M, Hilton GM, PETA Science Consortium International e.V., Stuttgart, Germany.

  • Marles, Robin J, Marles RJ, Health Products and Food Branch (Scientist Emeritus), Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Trombetti, Stefania, Trombetti S, Public Sector Senior Executive (Ret.), Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2025
SOURCE: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;159:105813. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105813. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
JOURNAL TITLE: Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295 (Electronic) 0273-2300 (Linking)
VOLUME: 159
PAGES: 105813
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: Netherlands
ABSTRACT:
Risk assessors, managers, and decision-makers are responsible for evaluating diverse human, environmental, and animal health risks. Although the critical elements of risk assessment and management are well-described in national and international documents, the ethical issues involved in risk decision-making have received comparatively little attention to date. To address this aspect, this article elaborates fundamental ethical principles designed to support fair, balanced, and equitable risk-based decision-making practices. Experts and global thinkers in risk, health, regulatory, and animal sciences were convened to share their lived experiences in relation to the intersection between risk science and analysis, regulatory science, and public health. Through a participatory and knowledge translation approach, an integrated risk decision-making model, with ethical principles and considerations, was developed and applied using diverse, contemporary risk decision-making and regulatory contexts. The ten principles - autonomy, minimize harm, maintain respect and trust, adaptability, reduce disparities, holistic, fair and just, open and transparent, stakeholder engagement, and One Health lens - demonstrate how public sector values and moral norms (i.e., ethics) are relevant to risk decision-making. We also hope these principles and considerations stimulate further discussion, debate, and an increased awareness of the application of ethics in identifying, assessing, and managing health risks.
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION: Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2025 Jun
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20250321
DATE COMPLETED: 20250412
DATE REVISED: 20250412
MESH DATE: 2025/04/13 00:44
EDAT: 2025/03/24 00:29
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
LOCATION IDENTIFIER: S0273-2300(25)00043-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105813 [doi]
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski