Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Cigarette smoking and cancer risk: modeling total exposure and intensity.

A recent analysis showed that the excess odds ratio (EOR) for lung cancer due to smoking can be modeled by a function which is linear in total pack-years and exponential in the logarithm of smoking intensity and its square. Below 15-20 cigarettes per day, the EOR/pack-year increased with intensity (direct exposure rate or enhanced potency effect), suggesting greater risk for a total exposure delivered at higher intensity (for a shorter duration) than for an equivalent exposure delivered at lower intensity. Above 20 cigarettes per day, the EOR/pack-year decreased with increasing intensity (inverse exposure rate or reduced potency effect), suggesting greater risk for a total exposure delivered at lower intensity (for a longer duration) than for an equivalent exposure delivered at higher intensity. The authors applied this model to data from 10 case-control studies of cancer, including cancers of the lung, bladder, oral cavity, pancreas, and esophagus. At lower intensities, there was enhanced potency for several cancer sites, but narrow ranges for pack-years increased uncertainty, precluding definitive conclusions. At higher intensities, there was a consistent reduced potency effect across studies. The intensity effects were statistically homogeneous, indicating that after accounting for risk from total pack-years, intensity patterns were comparable across the diverse cancer sites.

Authors

  • Lubin, Jay H, Lubin JH, Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. lubinj@mail.nih.gov

  • Alavanja, Michael C R, Alavanja MC,

  • Caporaso, Neil, Caporaso N,

  • Brown, Linda M, Brown LM,

  • Brownson, Ross C, Brownson RC,

  • Field, R William, Field RW,

  • Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Garcia-Closas M,

  • Hartge, Patricia, Hartge P,

  • Hauptmann, Michael, Hauptmann M,

  • Hayes, Richard B, Hayes RB,

  • Kleinerman, Ruth, Kleinerman R,

  • Kogevinas, Manolis, Kogevinas M,

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D,

  • Langholz, Bryan, Langholz B,

  • Letourneau, Ernest G, Letourneau EG,

  • Lynch, Charles F, Lynch CF,

  • Malats, Nuria, Malats N,

  • Sandler, Dale P, Sandler DP,

  • Schaffrath-Rosario, Angelika, Schaffrath-Rosario A,

  • Schoenberg, Janet B, Schoenberg JB,

  • Silverman, Debra T, Silverman DT,

  • Wang, Zuoyuan, Wang Z,

  • Wichmann, H-Erich, Wichmann HE,

  • Wilcox, Homer B, Wilcox HB,

  • Zielinski, Jan M, Zielinski JM,

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2007
SOURCE: Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 15;166(4):479-89. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm089. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: Am J Epidemiol
JOURNAL TITLE: American journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 0002-9262 (Print) 0002-9262 (Linking)
VOLUME: 166
ISSUE: 4
PAGES: 479-89
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: United States
ABSTRACT:
A recent analysis showed that the excess odds ratio (EOR) for lung cancer due to smoking can be modeled by a function which is linear in total pack-years and exponential in the logarithm of smoking intensity and its square. Below 15-20 cigarettes per day, the EOR/pack-year increased with intensity (direct exposure rate or enhanced potency effect), suggesting greater risk for a total exposure delivered at higher intensity (for a shorter duration) than for an equivalent exposure delivered at lower intensity. Above 20 cigarettes per day, the EOR/pack-year decreased with increasing intensity (inverse exposure rate or reduced potency effect), suggesting greater risk for a total exposure delivered at lower intensity (for a longer duration) than for an equivalent exposure delivered at higher intensity. The authors applied this model to data from 10 case-control studies of cancer, including cancers of the lung, bladder, oral cavity, pancreas, and esophagus. At lower intensities, there was enhanced potency for several cancer sites, but narrow ranges for pack-years increased uncertainty, precluding definitive conclusions. At higher intensities, there was a consistent reduced potency effect across studies. The intensity effects were statistically homogeneous, indicating that after accounting for risk from total pack-years, intensity patterns were comparable across the diverse cancer sites.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2007 Aug 15
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20070604
DATE COMPLETED: 20070831
DATE REVISED: 20241219
MESH DATE: 2007/09/01 09:00
EDAT: 2007/06/06 09:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski