Publication related to RSI or an RSI staff member

Impacts of operative delivery for the first twin on neonatal outcomes in the second twin.

We assess the impacts of operative delivery for the first twins with vertex presentation on neonatal outcomes in second twins using the 1995 to 1997 twin registry data of the United States. A total of 102,554 eligible twin pairs with vertex presentation for the first twin were included in the analysis. Of these, 50,748 (49.5%) first twins had a normal vaginal delivery, 43,504 (42.4%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 8302 (8.1%) were delivered by vaginal operation (vacuum extraction or forceps). In term twins, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.45), newborn injury (OR, 2.10; 95% 1.39 to 3.12), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 1.49; 95% 1.24 to 1.78), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 1.34; 95% 1.20 to 1.51) were increased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by vaginal operation compared with those whose co-twins who had normal vaginal delivery. In contrast, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (OR, 0.55; 95% 0.17 to 1.57), newborn injury (OR, 0.20; 95% 0.11 to 0.34), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 0.51; 95% 0.44 to 0.60), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 0.77; 95% 0.71 to 0.83) were decreased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by cesarean section compared with those whose co-twins had a normal vaginal delivery. In conclusion, vaginal operative delivery for the first twins is related to the adverse neonatal outcomes of their co-twins, whereas cesarean delivery for the first twins is associated with the beneficial neonatal outcomes of their co-twins.

Authors

  • Yang, Qiuying, Yang Q, OMNI Research Group, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Walker, Mark C, Walker MC,

  • Chen, Xi Kuan, Chen XK,

  • Krewski, Daniel, Krewski D,

  • Fung Kee Fung, Karen, Fung Kee Fung K,

  • Wen, Shi Wu, Wen SW,

YEAR OF PUBLICATION: 2006
SOURCE: Am J Perinatol. 2006 Oct;23(7):381-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951286. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
JOURNAL TITLE ABBREVIATION: Am J Perinatol
JOURNAL TITLE: American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 0735-1631 (Print) 0735-1631 (Linking)
VOLUME: 23
ISSUE: 7
PAGES: 381-6
PLACE OF PUBLICATION: United States
ABSTRACT:
We assess the impacts of operative delivery for the first twins with vertex presentation on neonatal outcomes in second twins using the 1995 to 1997 twin registry data of the United States. A total of 102,554 eligible twin pairs with vertex presentation for the first twin were included in the analysis. Of these, 50,748 (49.5%) first twins had a normal vaginal delivery, 43,504 (42.4%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 8302 (8.1%) were delivered by vaginal operation (vacuum extraction or forceps). In term twins, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.45), newborn injury (OR, 2.10; 95% 1.39 to 3.12), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 1.49; 95% 1.24 to 1.78), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 1.34; 95% 1.20 to 1.51) were increased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by vaginal operation compared with those whose co-twins who had normal vaginal delivery. In contrast, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (OR, 0.55; 95% 0.17 to 1.57), newborn injury (OR, 0.20; 95% 0.11 to 0.34), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 0.51; 95% 0.44 to 0.60), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 0.77; 95% 0.71 to 0.83) were decreased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by cesarean section compared with those whose co-twins had a normal vaginal delivery. In conclusion, vaginal operative delivery for the first twins is related to the adverse neonatal outcomes of their co-twins, whereas cesarean delivery for the first twins is associated with the beneficial neonatal outcomes of their co-twins.
LANGUAGE: eng
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2006 Oct
DATE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION: 20060928
DATE COMPLETED: 20070212
DATE REVISED: 20061018
MESH DATE: 2007/02/13 09:00
EDAT: 2006/09/30 09:00
STATUS: MEDLINE
PUBLICATION STATUS: ppublish
OWNER: NLM

Related RSI Experts

Daniel Krewski

Chief Risk Scientist

Dr. Daniel Krewski is Chief Risk Scientist and co-founder of Risk Sciences International (RSI), a firm established in 2006 to bring evidence-based, multidisciplinary expertise to the challenge of understanding, managing, and communicating risk. As RSI’s inaugural CEO and long-time scientific...
Read More about Daniel Krewski